Monday, 30 September 2013

Stages of child language acquisition

"The process of learning does not require only hearing and applying, but also forgetting and remembering again"
Dear bloggers,

I am here again. This post will be the continuation of the previous one. I will also post about the stages of child language acquisition. I also want to see your comments and your recommendations about this theme.


Stages of child language acquisition

From approximately 0 to 4 months, child sounds are limited to reflexive crying.This is their only way to express their feelings.This is their first production of what scholars call vegetative sounds.By roughly 4 to 6 months of age babies start to make many more sounds.Before speaking words, babies go through a period of babbling, in which they are practicing the sounds, intonations and rhythm of language. By 9 to 12 months the child`s babbling becomes more melodic.Intonation starts to sound more like adult patterns. By 10 to 12 months babies start to distinguish between the phonemes of his or her language and other languages.In this period, they also start to recognize words and even begin to understand their meaning.Children learn to pick out sound patterns that are repeated through normal adult conversation and eventually attach meaning to them.Baby talk or `motherese` is a natural, instinctive way that parents help this process along.By approximately 14 to 20 months of age, children begin with content words(these would include `mama` or `dada`or `book` or `car`).Of course, they usually do not sound like one would expect.`Book` may sound like `boo`.It is common at this stage to leave off consonants or consonant clusters from the beginning or end of a word.At this stage, a single word may represent an entire thought, i.e.`boo` may mean a `read me a book`. Between 18 to 24 months, spoken vocabulary starts to catch up.At this stage children begin to learn words by imitating.


From approximately 2 years of age, children begin to string two content words together to indicate location, i.e.`daddy gone`, possession `doggie mine` or action `mommy juice`. Multi-word sentences begin somewhere between ages 2 and 3.At this point they understand word order and context.Through practice they begin to master the morphology of language and start adding affixes, like `ing`, so `mommy walk` becomes `mommy walking`.




Learning Language


Children do not learn language simply through imitation and practice.Children`s early speech seems best explained in terms of a developing system.Second language learners pass through sequences of development.Many of these sequences are similar to those of children learning their first language.
Children`s earliest language is often called `telegraphic`.At this early age, children leave out many of the small words, like prepositions and articles.A child`s knowledge of the grammatical system is built up in predictable sequnces.Grammatical markers such as –ing of the present progressive or the –ed of the past tense are not acquired at the same time, but in sequence.The acquisition of certain grammatical features follows similar patterns in children in different environments. Child language is not viewed as an incorrect version of the adult system, but as a system in its own right.Not all errors made by second language learners could be explained in terms of first language transfer alone.
Second language learners` errors could be explained better in terms of learners` attempts to discover the structure of the language being learned rather than an attempt to transfer patterns of their first language.Many error types are common to both learners.Both make errors of subject-verb agreement(for example,  `a cowboy go` and `three robbers in mountain sees` by learner 1 and `Santa Clause ride` and `they plays` by learner 2). Such errors are clearly not due to first language interference but rather are `developmental` in nature.These are referred to as development errors which might very well be made by children acquiring English as their first language.


Development sequences

Research on language acquisition has revealed that there are important similarities between first language learners and second language learners.In both first and second language acquisition, there are sequences or `stages` in the development of particular structures.Developmental sequences are similar across learners from different backgrounds: what is learned early by one is learned early by others.Children`s language learning is partly tied to their cognitive development, that is, to their learning about relationships among people, events or objects around them. But among second language learners it is more remarkable that developmental sequences are so similar.Virtually every English sentence has one or more articles (`a` or `the`), but many learners have great difficulty using these forms correctly.Natural second language learners acquire grammatical morphemes in much the same way that first language learners do.
Although a review of all the `morpheme acquisition` studies that the learner`s first language has a more important influence on acquisition orders than some researchers would claim.Second language acquisition has revealed that learners pass through stages of acquisition which are very similar to those of first language learners.Perhaps more remarkable is the consistency in the acquisition of word order in questions.This development is not based on learning new meaning, but rather on learning different linguistic forms.Second language learners learn to form questions in a sequence of development which is similar in most respects to first language question development.Learners who receive grammar-based instruction still pass through the
same development sequences and make the same types of errors as those who acquire language in natural settings.


I hope that some of you will find this rewarding for your work and studies. See you soon with new posts.

Kind regards,

Rade.





Friday, 23 August 2013

Games and language learnin - 2nd part

Dear,

In the very beginning, I want to thank to all those who visit my blog. Thank you so much. On the other hand, I have to say that I was a little bit lazy during my annual leave, so I did not post anything for a while. In this post, I will emphasize the things which are very rewarding during the process of learning the second language. I used to say some things about it in my previous post, so this is the continuation of it.


The natural order hypothesis



This hypothesis states that we acquire the rules of a language in a predictable sequence.The rules which are the easiest to state are not necessarily the first to be acquired. Krashan asserts that the natural order is independent of the order in which the rules have been taught.Most of the evidence for this hypothesis comes from the morpheme studies, in which children`s speech has been examined for accuracy of certain grammatical morphemes(mostly noun and verbs `endings` such as plural-s and past tense-ed in English).


The input hypothesis



Krashan asserts that we acquire language in only one way by receiving comprehensible input, that is, by understanding messages.If the input contains forms and structures, then both comprehension and acquisition will occur.Krashan admits that comprehensible input is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for acquisition.









The affective-filter hypothesis



 The `affective filter` is an imaginary barrier which prevents learners from using input which is available in the environment.`Affect` refers to such things as motives, needs, attitudes and emotional states.Thus, depending on the learner`s state of mind or disposition, the filter limits what is noticed and what is acquired.The filter will be `up` or operating when the learner is stressed, self-conscious or unmotivated.It will be `down` when the learner is relaxed and motivated.What makes this hypothesis attractive is that it appears to have immediate  implications for classroom practice.Teacher can understand why some learners may be successful while others are not.The difficulty with the hypothesis is that it is difficult to be sure that the affective factors cause the differences in language acquisition.


Factors affecting second language learning

It was pointed out that all normal children, given a normal upbringing, are successful in the acquisition of their first language.Some learners never achieve native-like command of a second language.The factor which makes it difficult to reach conclusions about relationships between individual learner characteristics and second language learning is how language proficiency is defined and measured.Some studies report that learners with a higher level of motivation are more successful language learners then those with lower motivation.Other studies report that highly motivated learners do not preform any better on a proficiency test then learners with much less motivation to learn the second language.A link between intelligence and second language learning has been reported.Intelligence levels were a good means of predicting how successful a learner would be at language learning. One factor which often affects motivation is the social dynamic or power relationship between the languages.



Aptitude



There is evidence in the research that some individuals have an exceptional `aptitude` for language learning.The most widely used aptitude tests are the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT). The test measure characteristics such as:

1)the ability to identify and memorize new sounds,

2)the ability to understand how words function grammatically in sentences,

3)the ability to figure out grammatical rules from language samples,

4)memory of new words.

One of the most serious problems is that it is not clear what the abilities are that constitute aptitude.





Personality



A number of personality characteristics have been proposed as likely to affect second language learning.It is often argued that an extroverted person is well-suited to language learning.Another aspects of personality which has been studied is inhibition.Inhibition discourages risk-taking which is necessary for progress in language learning.However, in general, the available research does not show a clearly defined relationship between personality and second language acquisition.






Learning styles



This research suggests that different learners approach a task with a different set of skills and preferred strategies.We have all heard people say that they cannot learn something until they have seen it.Such learners would fall into the group called `visual` learners.Other people, who may be called `aural` learners, seem to need only to hear something once or twice before they know it.However, there is clearly some truth to the intuition that certain way of approaching a task are more successful for one person then for another.





Age of acquisition



Age is a characteristic which is easier to define and measure than personality, aptitude or motivation.The relationship between a learner`s age and his or her potential for success in second language acquisition is the subject of much lively debate.It has been widely observed that children from immigrant families eventually speak the language of their new community with native-like fluency.The critical period hypothesis suggests that there is a time in human development when the brain is predisposed for success in language learning.Developmental changes in brain change the nature of second language acquisition.Language learning which occurs after the end of the critical period may not be based on the innate structures believed to contribute to first language acquisition or second language acquisition in early childhood.Older learners depend on more general learning abilities.These general learning abilities are not as successful for language learning as the more specific.It is difficult to compare children and adults as second language learners.

Children are intrinsically better learners.The reason for children`s apparently speedy learning may be the sheer amount of the time they are usually exposed to the language.Adult`s capacity for understanding and logical thought is greater, and they are likely to have developed a number of learning skills and strategies which children do not yet have.Another reason is that most adults are learning voluntarily.Teachers commonly notice that they cannot get children to concentrate on certain learning activities.The problem is not the concentration span itself, but rather the ability of the individual to persevere with something of no immediate intrinsic interest to them.Older learners do exhibit noticeable superiority, because they tend to be more self-disciplined. One implication for teaching is the need to devote a lot of thought to the interest value of learning activities for younger learners.It is easier to motivate children.You can raise children`s motivation and enthusiasm more easily than that of older.On the other hand, you can also lose it more easily: monotonous activities quickly bore and demotivate younger learners.Younger learner`s motivation is more likely to vary.In general, children have a greater immediate need to be motivated by the teacher or the materials in order to learn effectively.Prizes and similar extrinsic words can help, but more effective on the whole are elements that contribute towards intrinsic motivation.Three very important sources of interest for children in the classroom are: pictures, stories and games.The teaching of foreign languages to adults is arguably less important, worldwide, than the teaching of children.Teaching adults is on the whole easier and less stressful.It is, however, often directed towards special purposes(for business, for academic study and so on). Even in an adult class, the teacher`s status as an authority is usually maintained.In return for conceding authority to the teacher in the classroom, adult learners demand ultimate returns in terms of their own benefit in learning outcomes.

Patrowski found that age of acquisition is a very important factor in setting limits on the development of native-like mastery of a second language.Older learners will not have native-like language skills and are more able to differ greatly from one another.The motivation to learn and individual differences in aptitude for language learning are also important determining factors in both rate of learning and eventual success in learning.

I hope that some of you will find something constructive in this post. 
Best regards
Rade


















Friday, 3 May 2013

Games and language learning

Hello everyone,

I am here after a long time. I did not write because I could not manage my daily duties. In other words, I was so, so busy by translating, by studying, by working and so on.
In this new post, I am going tell something about the rewarding ways of how young learners acquire their first words in English, especially those who are not native speakers of English. I will also present my "Diploma paper" because I wrote about it therein.



INTRODUCTION


One of the most fascinating aspects of human development is the ability to learn language.We all watch and listen with absolute fascination as the first `coos` and `googles`.We all share in the pride and joy of parents whose one-year-old has uttered the first `bye bye`. Learning a language is an amazing feat.Language learning is hard work.One must make an effort to understand, to repeat accurately, to manipulate newly understood language.Games help and encourage many learners to sustain their interest and work.The contribution of drilling lies in the concentration on a language form and its frequent use during a limited period of time.Games provide the key feature of `drill` with the opportunity to sense the working of language as living communication.


Games and Language Learning

Traditional behaviourists believed that language learning is simply a matter of imitation and habit formation.Children imitate the sounds and patterns which they hear around them.They continue to imitate and practice these sounds and patterns until they form `habits` of correct language use.According to this view[1], the quality and quantity of the language which the child hears should have an effect on the child`s success in language learning.Children`s imitation is selective and based on what they are currently learning.Even when the child imitates, the choice of what to imitate seems to be based on something the child already knows, not simply on what is `available` in environment.Children appear to pick out patterns and then generalize them to new contexts.

They create new forms or new uses of words until they finally figure out how the forms are used by adults.The behaviourist explanations for language acquisition offer a reasonable way of understanding how children learn some of the regular and aspects of language.The linguist Noam Chomsky claims that children are biologically programmed for language and that language develops in the child in just the same way that other biological functions develop.The child does not have to be taught, most children learn to walk at about the same time.For Chomsky language acquisition is very similar to the development of walking.The environment makes a basic contribution.The child, or rather, the child`s biological endowment will do the rest.Chomsky argues that the behaviourist theory fails to recognize what has come to be called `the logical problem of language acquisition`.


This logical problem refers to the fact that children come to know more about the structure of their language.According to Chomsky, the language the child is exposed to in the environment is full of confusing information.The evidence seems very strong that children are by no means systematically corrected or instructed on language points.When parents do correct, they tend to focus on meaning and not on language itself.According to Chomsky, children are born with a special ability to discover for themselves the underlying rules of a language system.Chomsky refers to this special ability as being based on a language acquisition device(LAD)[2]. This device was often described as an imaginary `black box` which exists somewhere in the brain.This  `black box` prevents the child from going off on lots of wrong trails in trying to discover the rules of language.For the LAD to work, the child needs access only to samples of the natural language.

Once it is activated, the child is able to discover the structure of the language to be learned by matching the innate knowledge of basic grammatical relationships to the structures of the particular language.Chomsky and his followers no longer use the term LAD, but refer to the child`s innate endowment as Universal Grammar.Universal Grammar is considered to consist of a set of principles which are common to all languages.If children are pre-equipped with `UG`, then what they have to learn is the ways in which their own language makes use of these principles.Children seem to develop language in similar ways and on similar schedule, in a way different from the way all children learn to walk.The child comes to `know` certain things about the language simply by being exposed to a limited number of examples.







[1] How Languages are Learned,Pasty M.Lightbrown and Nina Spada, page 8


[2] How Languages are Learned, Patsy M.Lightbrown and Nina Spada, page 11 


The critical period hypothesis

Lennebreg observed that this ability to develop normal behaviours and knowledge in variety of environments does not continue indefinitely and that children who have never learned language cannot return to normal.He argued the the language acquisition device works successfully only when it is stimulated at the right time.The strong version is that children must acquire their first language by puberty.The weak version is that language will be more difficult and incomplete after puberty.

The interactionists`position is that language develops as a result of the complex interplay between the uniquely human characteristics of the child and the environment in which the child develops.To the interactionists' theory, what is important is the conversational give-and-take in which the adult intuitively responds to the clues provides as to the level of language he or she is capable of processing.One-to-one interaction gives the child access to language which is adjusted to his or her level of comprehension.






Theories of first language acquisition

The fascinating ability of child to acquire the native language has been a subject of interest for linguists and psychologists for many centuries.Even if we ask ourselves a very simple question:`How did we learn our own language?`, we will find that it is almost impossible to answer.However,if a child is given a normal developmental environment, he or she acquire the language fluently and efficiently.The most amazing fact is that will acquire it almost intuitively, without special instruction.As I mentioned previously, they are able to communicate efficiently by about age 3.There are two polarized positions in the study of first language acquisition.At the one pole, there are scholars who claim that language acquisition is a learned behaviour, which is not different from general learning system and that parents teach language to their children.They claim that children come into the world with tabula rasa, a clean state without notions about the world or about the language itself.At the other pole, there are scholars who assume that language is innate, that there are universal principles, which govern language acquisition and that children already have knowledge of language and the world.





Theories of second language learning

It is clear that a child or adult acquiring a second language is different from a child acquiring a first language in terms of both personal characteristics and conditions for learning.All second language learners regardless of age, have by definition already acquired at least one language.This prior knowledge may be an advantage in the sense that the learner has an idea of how languages work.The first language learners does not have the cognitive maturity, metalinguistic awareness or world knowledge of the older second language learner.Young secong language learners have begun to develop cognitive maturity and meta- linguistic awareness.


Behaviourism:The second language view

According to the behaviourists, all learning, whether verbal or non-verbal takes place through the same underlying process, habit formation.Learners receive linguistic input from speakers in the environment.Where there are similarities between the two languages, the learner will acquire target language structures with ease.The influence is simply a matter of `habits`, but rather a systematic attempt by the learner to use knowledge already acquired in learning a new language.





Cognitive theory:A new psychological approach

Cognitive psychologists tend to see second language acquisition as the building up of knowledge systems that can eventually be called on automatically for speaking and understanding.At first, learners have to pay attention to any aspect of the language which they are trying to understand or produce.Gradually, through experience and practice, learners become able to use certain parts of their knowledge so quickly and automatically that they are not even aware that they are doing it.Cognitive psychologists have also investigated a phenomenon they call `restructuring`[1]. They seem rather to be based on the interaction of knowledge we already have, or on the acquisition of new knowledge which somehow `fits into an existing system`. The theory itself cannot easily predict what kinds of structures will be automized through practice.Cognitive theory is also not able to predict which first language structure will be transferred and which will not.This theory is incomplete without a linguistic framework of some kind.


Creative construction theory

What is a distinctive about this theory is that it proposes that internal processing strategies operate on language input without any direct dependence on the learner.The creative construction theory which has had the most influence on second language teaching practice is the one proposed by Stephen Krashen. Krashen has developed an overall theory of second language acquisition.Five central hypotheses constitute his `monitor model`. They are:

1)The acquisition-learning hypothesis

2)The monitor hypothesis

3)The natural order hypothesis

4)The input hypothesis

5)The affective-filter hypothesis





The acquisition-learning hypothesis

There are two ways for adult second language learners to approach learning a second language: they may `acquire` it or they may `learn` it. He says, we acquire as we engage in meaningful interaction in the second language, in much the same way that children pick up their first language with no attention to form.For Krashan, acquisition is by far the more important process. He asserts that learning cannot turn into acquisition, citing that many speakers are quite competent without ever having learned rules, while other speakers may `know` rules but continue to break them.



The monitor hypothesis

Krashan argues that the acquired systemacts to initiate the speaker utterances and is responsible for fluency and intuitive judgements about correctness.The learned system acts only as an editor or `monitor`, making minor changes and polishing what the acquired system has produced. Krashan has specified three conditions necessary for monitor use:sufficient time, focus on form and knowing the rules.Thus, writing is more conducive to monitor use then is speaking, where the focus is on content and not on form.The obvious weakness in this hypothesis is that it is very difficult to show evidence of `monitor` use.It is impossible to determine what has been produced by the acquired system. Krashan`s claim that learning cannot turn into acquisition means that anything which is produced quickly and apparently must have been acquired rather then learned.






[1] How Languages are Learned, Patsy M.Lightbrown and Nina Spada, page 30

I will continue more in the next post. I hope that some of you will find this constructive for your studies.
I also want to thank all those people who visit my blog.

Everything the best
Best regards

Rade  

 


Wednesday, 12 December 2012

Eight Things Skilled Teachers Think, Say, and Do




As a young teacher, who is eager to find always something good and rewarding, I like to improve myself more and more. I always like to share the pieces of information with others. So, I also like to learn from someone's experience. In this post, I will put up something I found on Facebook that my colleague published. 
As the title says, it is about what a good teacher should do in every situation in order to attract students and to motivate them to achieve more.This constructive text is written by Larry Ferlazzo.
Among the many challenges teachers face, often the most difficult is how to engage students who seem unreachable, who resist learning activities, or who disrupt them for others. This is also one of the challenges that skilled teachers have some control over. In my nine years of teaching high school, I've found that one of the best approaches to engaging challenging students is to develop their intrinsic motivation. The root of intrinsic is the Latin intrinsecus, a combination of two words meaning within and alongside. It's likely that our students are intrinsically motivated—just motivated to follow their own interests, not to do what we want them to do. Teachers' challenge is to work alongside our students, to know their interests and goals, and to develop trusting relationships that help students connect their learning to their goals in a way that motivates from within. How can teachers do this? It's helpful to consider this question in three parts: What skilled teachers think, what they say, and what they do.


What Skilled Teachers Can Think

What we think guides how we view the world, including how we view challenging students. Developing and maintaining three mind-sets will help teachers maintain their equilibrium in the face of behavior or resistance to learning from certain students that would ordinarily knock us off balance.
1. Remember that authoritative beats authoritarian.
Being authoritarian means wielding power unilaterally to control someone, demanding obedience without giving any explanation for why one's orders are important. Being authoritative, on the other hand, means demonstrating control, but doing so relationally through listening and explaining. Studies of effective parenting have found that children view parents who use an authoritative style as legitimate authority figures; such children are less likely to engage in delinquent behavior. The opposite is true for children of authoritarian parents (University of New Hampshire, 2012). It's not too much of a stretch to apply this finding to teachers and students. As you interact with students, frequently ask yourself which of these two styles you use. Do you want to always lead with your mouth—or with your ears? Bring this authoritative-authoritarian question to bear on your classroom practices. In terms of instruction, are you always the sage on stage? Do you have students periodically evaluate your class and you as a teacher—and seriously consider their feedback? Do you explain to students why you teach the way you do? When a student's behavior is causing a problem, do you control the behavior at any cost, or do you try to find out what's going on with that student? Opting for the authoritative style will make students more likely to respect your authority—and probably more eager to cooperate.

2. Believe that everyone can grow.
Many teachers are familiar with Carol Dweck's distinction between a "growth" mind-set and a "fixed" one. When we have a growth mind-set, we believe that everyone has the inner power to grow and change. We see mistakes as opportunities to learn. Holding a fixed mind-set leads us to believe that people's traits—such as intelligence—are immutable. A mistake on the part of someone we believe is unintelligent seems to validate that belief. Which mind-set we hold makes a tremendous difference. In one study, a researcher measured teachers' mind-sets at the beginning of the year. In classes led by teachers who showed fixed mind-sets, few students with learning challenges advanced academically during the year. But in classes taught by those with growth mind-sets, many previously low-performing students made gains (Dweck, 2010). Teachers with a fixed mind-set tend to immediately and permanently place students into categories. They place the primary responsibility for overcoming learning challenges on the students. Those with a growth mind-set consider responding to a student's challenges to be the joint responsibility of the student and the educator. Teachers aren't superhuman. There are some things we cannot accomplish. But we must ask ourselves whether we too readily write off students who try our patience as "incapable," or some similar adjective, without considering whether differentiating instruction for these students might spur change and growth.One of my students had never written an essay in his school career. He was intent on maintaining that record during our unit on writing persuasive essays. Because I knew two of his passions were football and video games, I told him that as long as he used the writing techniques we'd studied, he could write an essay on why his favorite football team was better than its rival or on why he particularly liked one video game. He ended up writing an essay on both topics.

3. Understand that power isn't a finite pie.
The power isn't a finite pie. If I share the power I have, that doesn't mean I'll have less. In fact, the pie will get bigger as more possibilities are created for everyone. Power struggles are at the root of much misbehavior. William Glasser (1988) believes that students have a basic need for power and that 95 percent of classroom management issues occur as a result of students trying to fulfill this need. Having more power actually helps students learn. Giving students choices—about their homework, assignments, how they're grouped, and so on—leads to higher levels of student engagement and achievement (Sparks, 2010). Remembering that power isn't finite helps us see that asking students for ideas on what might help them feel more engaged isn't a sign of weakness, but of strength. So is seeking advice from students' parents or from teachers in other classes in which challenged learners show more success. Over the years, I've gained great insight and become a more effective teacher by asking parents, "Tell me about a time in your child's life when he or she was learning a lot and working hard in school. What was his or her teacher doing then?"


What Skilled Teachers Can Say

4. Give positive messages.
Positive messages are essential to motivation. Subtle shifts in teacher language infuse positive messages throughout our interactions. Here are three practices I've found helpful. Use positive framing. "Loss framed" messages (if you do this, then something bad will happen to you) don't have the persuasive advantage that they're often thought to have. "Positive framed messages" (if you do this, these good things will happen) are more effective (Dean, 2010). I've had more success talking with students about how changing their behavior will help them achieve their goals (such as graduating from high school or going to college) than I've had threatening them with negative consequences. Positive messages that connect students' current actions to broader student-identified hopes or goals are different from "if-then" statements focused on what teachers want students to do ("If you don't get out of your seat without permission, then you'll get extra credit"). As Daniel Pink (2009) notes, such extrinsic manipulations don't develop students' higher-order thinking skills or long-term commitments to change. Say "yes." Avoidant instruction is language that emphasizes what people should not do ("Don't walk on the grass." "Don't chew gum"). Some researchers (British Psychological Society, 2010) believe that a more effective way to get a desired behavior is to emphasize what you want people to do. For example, if a student asks to go the restroom, but the timing isn't right, rather than saying no, I try to say, "Yes, you can. I just need you to wait a few minutes." Or if a student is talking at an inappropriate time, instead of saying, "Don't talk!" I sometimes go over and tell that learner, "I see you have a lot of energy today. We'll be breaking into small groups later and you'll have plenty of time to talk then. I'd appreciate your listening now." Say "please" and "thank you." People are more likely to comply with a task (and do so more quickly) if someone asks them instead of tells them (Yong, 2010). I've found that "Can you please sit down?" is more effective than "Sit down!" Saying thank you provides immediate positive reinforcement to students. Research (Sutton, 2010) shows that people who are thanked by authority figures are more likely to cooperate, feel valued, and exhibit self-confidence.

5. Apologize.
Teachers are human, and we make plenty of mistakes. There is no reason why we shouldn't apologize when we do. But saying, "I'm sorry," may not be enough. I often use the "regret, reason, and remedy" formula recommended by Dorothy Armstrong (2009). For example, one afternoon my students Omar and Quang were paired up in my class but were sitting passively while everyone else focused on the task at hand. I said sharply, "Come on now, get working!" A few minutes later, I said simply to the two boys, "I'm sorry I barked at you earlier. I was frustrated that you weren't doing what I'd asked you to do. I'll try to show more patience in the future." They clearly focused more energy on their work after this apology.

What Skilled Teachers Can Do

6. Be flexible.
Being flexible might be the most important thing teachers can "do" to help students who challenge us—in fact all students—to get past whatever challenges of their own they confront. Three practices help me differentiate instruction and classroom management in a way that helps everyone. Help them get started. Psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik identified the Zeigarnik Effect: Once people start doing something, they tend to want to finish it (Dean, 2011). If we get a disengaged or anxious student started, that's half the battle. For a task that's likely to challenge some students, present a variety of ways to get started: a menu of questions, the option to create a visual representation of a concept, a chance to work with a partner. Encourage students to launch themselves by just answering the first question or the easiest one. Help postpone tempting distractions. Making a conscious decision to postpone giving in to temptation can reduce a desire that's getting in the way of a goal (Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 2012). My student Mai was frequently using her cell phone to text message during class. I didn't want to take her phone away, so I made a deal with her—she could text in my classroom during two specific times: from the moment she entered the room until the bell rang and as soon as the lunch bell rang. Since we made that deal, Mai hardly ever uses her cell phone during class. Even more significant, she hardly ever uses it during our agreed-on times. Acknowledge stress. As most of us know from experience, people tend to have less self-control when they're under stress (Szalavitz, 2012). When a student is demonstrating self-control issues in my class, I often learn through a conversation with him or her that this student is going through family disruptions or similar problems. Sometimes, just providing students an opportunity to vent worries can have a positive effect.


7. Set the right climate.
Pink (2009) and other researchers have found that extrinsic rewards work in the short term for mechanical tasks that don't require much higher-order thinking, but they don't produce true motivation for work that requires higher-order thinking and creativity. However, everyone needs "baseline rewards"—conditions that provide adequate compensation for one's presence and effort. At school, baseline rewards might include fair grading, a caring teacher, engaging lessons, and a clean classroom. If such needs aren't met, Pink (2009) notes, the student will focus on "the unfairness of her situation and the anxiety of her circumstance. … You'll get neither the predictability of extrinsic motivation nor the weirdness of intrinsic motivation. You'll get very little motivation at all".

8. Teach life lessons.
 These simple, engaging activities help students see how it's in their short-term and long-term interest to try their best. For example, a lesson might highlight how the learning process physically alters the brain. This particular lesson encourages a growth mind-set. It was eye-opening to one of my students who had claimed, "We're all born smart or dumb and stay that way." In terms of keeping up kids' motivation, the times throughout the year when I refer back to these concepts and reflect on how they apply to learning struggles are as important as the initial lessons.

What We Can Always Do

Consistently implementing these practices is easier said than done—and is probably impossible unless you're Mother Teresa. But most teachers already do something that makes all these practices flow more naturally, and that we can do more intensely with conscious effort—we build relationships with students. Caring relationships with teachers helps students build resilience. By fostering these relationships, we learn about students' interests and goals, which are fuel for motivation. On Fridays, my students write short reflections about the week. One Friday, I asked them to write about the most important thing they'd learned in class that week. One student wrote, "I didn't really learn anything important this week, but that's OK because Mr. Ferlazzo tried his best." Although I wasn't that thrilled with the first part of his comment, there's an important message in the second half. Even if we can't always think, say, and do the ideal thing to strengthen struggling students' motivation, there's always something we can do to meet them halfway. We can try our best.

I hope that the information will be rewarding and helpful for teachers, especially for those ones who do not have a lot of experience in teaching process.

Best regards

Rade